Linux vs windows security

2020-02-17 22:18 Why Linux is better than Windows or macOS for security Decisions made years ago about which operating system to roll out can affect corporate security today. Of the big three in widespread use

May 25, 2004 Linux and Windows security compared. Windows 98, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, and Windows CE are just a subset of Microsoft's offerings. Linux distributions vary by the Linux kernel release each is based on (e. g. , 2. 2, 2. 4, and 2. 6) and the versions of all the packages each contains. linux vs windows security Windows security expert Jonathan Hassell compares Windows and Linux security offerings in his first column. While he says Windows is the easier operating system for him

Windows is the dominant force in the operating system landscape, but Linux retains a loyal user base of its own According to analysis by NetMarketShare, Windows has a whopping 88 percent of the overall operating system market. Microsoft claims that Windows 10 is now running on nearly 700 million linux vs windows security

1 Answer 1. Linux isn't really more secure than Windows. It's really more a matter of scope than anything. No matter what malware, exploits, and bad users exist EVERYWHERE. One being more secure than the other is nothing more than anecdotal evidence. Malware exists for nix, Mac, Windows, Android, iOS, Symbian, Xbox(yes), hard drives, and bios. The MSWindows sysadmins claim that Windows is just as secure as UNIX is, and the only source of concern is that MSWindows has such an overwhelming majority of the market share. UNIX sysadmins claim that UNIX is intrinsically better designed than MSWindows is. The differences in security between Linux and Windows are complex; Youssef Bassil of the Lebanese Association for Computational Sciences spent nine pages detailing the differences in his article linux vs windows security

Gallery Linux vs windows security